|
1
|
- Under the influence of surface water
|
|
2
|
- Jim Touw, HCL
- Norm Zastre, The Groundwater Centre
|
|
3
|
- To maintain a groundwater source that is safe to drink
- Using methods that are practical and at a sensible cost
|
|
4
|
- Recoverable water that occupies voids (porosity) in the subsurface
- Between grains
- In fractures
- In solution cavities
|
|
5
|
- Ground Water Under the Direct Influence of surface water
- Subject to the same treatment requirements as surface water
- If Cryptosporidium or Giardia are present, then GWUDI
- If Crypto or Giardia are not present, how to determine if GWUDI?
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Potable groundwater originates on or near the land surface
- Therefore, potable groundwater is technically GWUDI
- The main issue is the pathogenic microbes that can be associated with
the surface water
|
|
8
|
- Most groundwater is recharged from precipitation
- Usually in late spring/early summer (most years)
- In summer if there is above-normal precipitation (occasionally)
- In the fall after vegetation has died and before ground freezes
(occasionally)
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Not necessarily around rivers and lakes
- Possible where a downward hydraulic gradient exists
|
|
11
|
- Pathogenic microbes
- Viruses
- Bacteria
- Protozoa
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Main factors
- Porosity type
- Microbe size
- Hydraulic gradient
- Secondary factors
- Temperature
- pH
- Mineralogy
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Water supply well construction – does it meet code?
- What are the surface conditions within 500 metres of the water supply
well?
- Is treatment necessary?
|
|
23
|
- Presence of pathogens
- Turbid groundwater
- Change in chemical quality
- Presence of nitrate in the groundwater
- Elevated concentration of chloride ion
|
|
24
|
- Water supply well construction
- Area of influence
- Three methods to calculate
- Field verification
- Water wells
- Abandoned/reclaimed
- Existing
- Possible contamination sources
- Agricultural
- Industrial
- Municipal
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Good news
- Very little evidence that groundwater is unsafe to drink in Alberta
- Bad news
- Very little meaningful data available for analysis
|
|
27
|
- There is going to be increased interest in the safety of the groundwater
in the future
- Data are being collected by public health, but they are not readily
available
- There is a definite need to bridge the gap between the public health
database and the technical database
|
|
28
|
|